Skip to main content

The Christian Church In America is Dead - Trump's Election Proves It!

Theologians have been preoccupied with the religion "about" Jesus, and it is the rejection of this religion that has produced the "Christian Atheists". But what about the religion "of" Jesus. -Eric Butterworth

Christian churches in America are social clubs. We do a nice job of providing excuses for people to exercise their instincts as a social animals. There are bowling teams, softball teams, basketball teams, ladies auxiliaries, youth groups and various boards on which to serve. We put on nice pot-luck dinners and serve coffee after worship services where members gather to discuss everything, except the content of the holy ritual they just attended. We discuss the sermon by noting it wasn't too boring, but the delivery could still use some work. We do a good job administering the rites of passage. Baptisms, confirmations, marriages and funerals legitimize our existence as religious institutions.

Indeed, the church should be a comfortable place where the soul can find rest and a sense of belonging. But it should also be a place where our human foibles are constantly challenged, where spiritual growth is front and center, where comfort does not become complacency, where the status quo is continually examined and questioned. Just like Jesus did.

While we may be well acquainted with the basic concepts of our particular denomination, what isn't clear is how they apply to "my" life - family, neighbors, co-workers, community, state, country and planet. Are we transformed by our church experience to deal with these issues as the "New Beings" we're supposed to be? Does the Gospel message really speak to the human soul, or is it just platitude - without any real practical application to life's complexities. What we understand on Sunday gets lost in the fog of daily life. That's because what we profess to believe has not been internalized in a way that raises our consciousness and deepens our commitment to living lives of holiness (wholeness = a fully integrated body, mind and soul).

The Christian church in America is not what it confesses to be. It's like a shell washed up on the shore. It displays a solid exterior, but internally it is devoid of the material needed to sustain viability. In other words, it's dead.

The ultimate proof? How else could Donald Trump, a candidate who so fervently embodies anti-christian beliefs and attitudes be elected President? His "Two Corinthians" comment aside, the president-elect doesn't even bother to feign a religious life or knowledge of Christian principles. His expressed values and attitudes embody the concept of "missing the mark", which is the original meaning of the word, "sin". We won't attempt to enumerate his transgressions here, since nearly every word and action bears witness. His contempt for Christian values is palpable.

If churches were truly alive with the Christian message, they would have mounted a response so loud and vehement, the candidate would never have made it past the first primary. If Pastors took seriously their prophetic responsibility to speak for truth, their voices would have shaken churches from Spokane to Cape Cod. If individuals and congregations were actually infused with the Holy Spirit, their collective Christ consciousness would have reached out to enlightened the better angels of all Americans.

Listen to these words of Jesus:
You shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria and to the end of the earth. Acts 1:8
So where then was The Conference of Catholic Bishops - the same Bishops who otherwise never hesitate to declare positions on doctrine? Pope Francis has made it clear where he stands, but aside from criticizing Trump's comments on immigration, the Conference has been shamefully silent. And where were the family values-centric Evangelicals? Why were they silent about the President elect's adultery and his amenability to sexual assault?

Is the fear of changing cultural norms so great these Christian leaders would subvert their basic principles to the point of enabling one they would normally dismiss out of hand? Does their service to church doctrine, which prohibits abortion and denounces homosexuality, imprison their ability to recognize a greater danger to the world at large? If so, it is in its effect, a betrayal of Jesus' message and ministry. It is a betrayal by those who are supposed to be most responsible for the spiritual welfare of humanity.

"The church should stay of of politics!" they protest, "Our purpose isn't to influence." And the instant response is - "Then do it! Stay out of politics". But of course, that's not possible. We, all of us, religionist and atheist, Christian, Jew and Muslim are involved in politics, whether we want to be or not. Don't want to participate in the world of politics? Move to another planet!

In truth, many Christian leaders have no problem endorsing candidates. We've seen how Evangelicals are not shy about politicizing current events and extolling the virtues of selected politicians. Certainly positions taken by the Catholic Church on social issues have a political component, even if it isn't positioned that way.

Yet, the issues that contributed to the failure of conscience in the recent election, are really just symptoms of the church's deeper dis-ease. The real malady festers below the surface. It is a systemic dysfunction that dooms any effort to positively influence human attitudes and behavior. With the exception of a few little known protestant denominations, Christian churches remain enmeshed in a world view, theology and religious language that has not changed in five-hundred years.

It is precisely this cultural dis-location that is responsible for the church's present state of impotence. The election of Donald Trump was symbolic of that impotence - the ineffectiveness of the Body of Christ to engage the power of the Holy Spirit in confronting intolerance with an updated mythology (language & symbols) that effectively expresses the ideals of love and compassion. Even if good intentions are present, the means to effectively act on them is not. It's like trying to power a modern high-speed train with steam. No matter how much is generated, the train won't move.

The Church needs to find a new voice - a new mythology - that speaks to the spiritual and emotional needs of the world today. Antiquated vocabularies and symbols no longer serve their function. The authoritarian hierarchical model on which churches have relied for centuries is no longer effective. Even some in the corporate world are beginning to understand this. Monolithic organizational structures are antithetical to the Gospel. Instead of following the business concept of bigger is better, churches need to become smaller, with as little bureaucracy and paid staff as possible. Using 12-step groups as a model would be a good start. Their minimalist self-supporting structure has worked well in keeping them focused and effective in their primary mission of supporting individuals for spiritual growth.

And so, the Church is left with a choice. It can either upgrade its software (mythology) to become more user friendly (relevant), or stay with a comfortably familiar but no longer effective way of healing the human heart and soul. Choosing the later means running the risk of empowering more Donald Trumps - or worse.

The spiritual needs of mankind haven't changed in two-thousand years, but the way to support those needs has to evolve. It's impossible to say whether or not having a mythology that effectively speaks to the spirit of the present day would have made any difference in the election. Nevertheless, it can be assumed that a Church which is more fully engaged in its mission to "preach the Gospel", would have responded in a way that was more attuned to its core principles.

The Gospel message calls for living at a higher level of consciousness, in a state of grace, with unconditional love, forgiveness, charity and peace that passes normal human understanding. We need every bit of that right here and now.
So everyone who proclaims love and forgiveness to the world, is one with the Spirit and holds the peace of eternity in their heart. Matthew 10:32, (RNV)


Popular posts from this blog

From Fox News to Fake News: Propaganda vs.Truth and The Struggle to Save Our Cultural Soul

People need good lies. There are too many bad ones. -Kurt Vonnegut

Politics, Money and Culture
Politics, money and culture have become bound together in an immense Gordian knot. Many accept this perverse relationship as normal. However, it is not normal, and the co-mingling has produced an intractable force which exploits society's willingness to substitute pleasure and power for value and meaning.

Besides having aesthetic value, the arts are legitimately used to raise awareness and help resolve issues that affect society. But they are also used as a means for achieving crass political ends.

Politics (the act of influencing actions and policies for the purpose of gaining and keeping power) has become like something straight out of a Kurt Vonnegut novel. Current events bear an uncanny resemblance to the writer's comically addled characters and absurd story lines. The line between reality and satire has become so blurred, it's sometimes difficult to tell which is which. Add to…

How Corporations Infiltrated the Supreme Court - Video

Futurist Who Predicted the Fall of Soviet Union Says US Power Will Decline Under President Trump

Johan Galtung, a Norwegian professor at the University of Hawaii and Transcend Peace University, first predicted in 2000 that the “U.S. empire” would wither away within 25 years, but he moved up that forecast by five years with the election of President George W. Bush. Now, nearly 17 years later, Galtung predicts that decline could come even quicker under a Trump administration. He predicted in his 2009 book, “The Fall of the American Empire — and then What?” that the U.S. was plagued by 15 internal contradictions that would end its global power by 2020. Galtung warned that phase of the decline would usher in a period of reactionary fascism. American fascism would spring from its "capacity for global violence, a vision of exceptionalism, a belief in an inevitable and final war between good and evil, the cult of a strong state leading that battle, and a cult of the 'strong leader'.”